Emilie Fairbanks, Esq.

202 681 4694 office

202 688 1864 fax

419 7th Street NW, Suite 405

Washington, DC 20004


Contact Us Now

Consultations by appointment. 

This area does not yet contain any content.

Check out our latest blog posts!


Resource for Landlords from DRCA: rentmydcbasement

DCRA created this website to help landlords renting out basement apartments in DC, a pretty common situation. It cannot replace getting legal advice, especially if you have an existing tenant and a problem has come up. It does provide useful information about licensing requirements and it gives any small landlord an idea of what DCRA will expect from them.  I think the best part is the checklist.  I am adding it to my list of resources but I thought it deserved a little extra attention. The full address is http://rentmydcbasement.wordpress.com/  If you have an existing legal problem, licensing usually won't solve it, but it certainly helps to have everything in order before you rent and you may be unable to move against a problem tenant if you do not have certain things done.    


Trans-Lux or the Right of Redemption: How, When, and How Much

Trans-Lux is just a specific way to refer to the right to redeem in DC.   It is important to understand exactly what the right to redeem entails.  In DC, after a judgment for non-payment of rent, until an eviction has been completed by the Marshalls service, the tenant always has the right to pay all of the money due, and keep the apartment. 

In this post, I want to look specifically at what costs are included in the redemption amount, how it can be paid, and when it can be paid. 

Landlords need to understand what they can require a tenant to pay in order to redeem, both to avoid unlawful evictions, which are costly for everyone involved, and so that they can avoid not collecting everything they are entitled to and creating debts that are uncollectable.  The amount has to match the amount permitted on the Notice to Tenant of Payment Required to Avoid Eviction, or Form 6, which the landlord must submit to the court after the judgment, and is signed by the judge and mailed to the tenant.  This form has to be filed within five days of the court judgment or the landlord has to get permission of the court to file it late. 

The writ with the dates of the possible eviction is mailed by the Marshalls service.  The writ is the only notice legally required to the tenant of the dates on which they may be evicted.  The landlord gets notice the day before that the eviction is taking place.  Some landlords then let the tenant know, and there are valid reasons for doing so, but all I will note is that it is not legally required and that it can lead to tenants going to court and asking for stays, something I have seen significantly drag out the process for the landlord and cost them a great deal of money.     

The tenant must pay 1) all of the rent due at the time of the payment, meaning if it is September 1st instead of August 30th, they must pay September rent as well as all the back rent, 2) the late fees permitted by the court on the Form 6, usually less than the amount of the late fees allowed in the lease, sometimes zero, 3) the court costs, also listed on the Form 6 and on the original complaint, and 4) the writ fee of $175 if the landlord has gotten a writ of restitution at the time the tenant redeems.  To redeem the tenant must pay in full, to the penny, so the landlord must be clear about the amount.  Most landlords only accept certified funds for redemption, i.e., money orders, cashier’s checks, or cash. 

The landlord must allow the tenant to redeem up until Marshalls have completed the eviction.  I have litigated that particular issue and no one knows exactly what it means, but practically, if the Marshalls are still on the property, they usually require the landlord accept the rent.  Best practice is for the landlord or a representative of the landlord capable of accepting rent to be physically present at every eviction.  

Evictions are messy and difficult.  Understanding the legal process and strictly following it is the best way to avoid the threat of wrongful eviction claims.  


DCRA Proactive Inspections Schedule

About a year ago, DCRA started “proactive inspections” of residential units in the District of Columbia.  All this really means is that they are doing inspections no one specifically requested.  They post the list of inspections to be done each month on their website here: http://www.dcra.dc.gov/DC/DCRA/Inspections/Proactive+Inspections

 While the landlord should get notice as well, it is worth keeping on eye on the list each month to make certain your property isn’t on the list and your notice was lost in the mail.

It is unclear how these inspections are going, or if they are even occurring as scheduled.  If you have any experience with the proactive inspection process, as either a landlord or a tenant, I would love to hear about it.  Send me an email at efairbanks@efairbankslaw.com with Proactive Inspection Story in the subject line.  


DC Residential Leases: Four Provisions Every Landlord Should Include

If you are thinking of renting out a space in DC there are many things to consider.  You should register with the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs and do all of the required licensing; you should screen your potential tenants through the local court systems for any civil judgments or evictions, as well as doing a credit check; you should set up a system for keeping rent ledgers; you should document the conditions of your property with photos and possibly an inspection by a contractor.  This is not an exhaustive list.  However, if you do all of these things and use a lease form you purchased at an office supply store or online, you could potentially negate much of the hard work you have done to protect your interests. 

I recommend you have a lease drafted for your specific situation by an attorney familiar with DC landlord/tenant law and familiar with your property.  For all of you who won’t do that, or if you had an attorney draft your lease and you want to see if they are really familiar with DC law, here are four things every DC residential lease should include.  None of them are intended to “trick” tenants.  They are basic provisions that conform to the quirks of DC law or are just things that have come up often in my practice.  Do not assume a “DC form lease” will include any of these things.  Most DC form lease are just Maryland leases with a new title, and they do not address the important issues specific to DC law.  

 This article is not intended to write your lease for you and it does not include sample provisions because each situation is too unique, but it is a checklist for things you need to include. 

1) Waiver of Notice to Quit for Non-Payment of Rent

This is the big one.  If you do nothing else, make sure to include a waiver of notice to quit in your lease.  Any DC L&T attorney will scan a lease for the waiver as soon as it is handed to them and most of the time it is the only provision discussed in court.  What is it?  The tenant is waiving their right to a thirty-day notice to cure or quit if they fail to pay rent.  Without this provision, you must give them thirty days to pay their rent after they are late.  Incidentally, HUD form leases do not include a waiver.  The best practice is to make this a separate provision; I have seen it thrown in everywhere and anywhere.  If you do not have a waiver and your tenant fails to pay rent, you must give them a thirty-day notice that conforms to the rules for all other thirty-day notices in DC law. 

2) Bar on Unauthorized Occupants and Subtenants

As this blog has previously discussed, a DC tenant is a tenant for life.  You want to have control over who your tenants are and who lives in your property.  Many multistate or generic leases will include some sort of ban on unauthorized subtenants, but it is usually not strong enough for DC.  A DC lease should list the persons permitted to live in the unit, state that no one else is permitted to live in the unit, and ban any subtenants.  

3) Criminal Activity/Drug Activity Ban

You should include a statement that any criminal activity or drug activity on or near the property is grounds for eviction.  This provision may or may not be useful to you, but if you have subsidized tenants it is required and should follow the language of the Federal One Strike provision for drug activity and also include separate language for criminal activity.  A subsidized tenant can be evicted for many types of criminal activity with a notice to quit, no cure provision required.  The government can also come after you for failing to evict or try to evict tenants who create a drug haven, so having this language can help you protect your property. 

4) Provision that Tenants Must Promptly Report all Defects

            This is not always useful for enforcement, but it is important to set the rules early in the tenancy that any problems should be reported immediately.  It also helps to attach a signed statement of how to report problems so that when a tenant says they did not know how to report that their sink was leaking, you can show you provided them with the information.  This is only useful if you are responsive when tenants call and if you fix problems when they occur.  

When you sign a residential lease in DC the provisions can be very hard to change.  The tenant has the right to stay in the property and the landlord has very few ways to make them sign a new lease, so it pays to be careful and specific about your lease.  Apart from choosing tenants carefully, which I cannot stress enough, careful lease drafting is your best protection and there is very little any attorney can do to get around a poorly written lease. 



Saving DC Homes from Foreclosure, or Making it Impossible to Get a Mortgage

The RealtyTrac Forclosure report for the first quarter of 2011 says that there were 63 foreclosures in the District of Columbia, an 84% decrease from the previous quarter and an 87% decrease from the same quarter the prior year. Some of you are thinking, wow, that is interesting.  Most are thinking, why do I care?  And almost all of you are thinking, isn't that good news?  It is interesting, it isn't good news, and if you are a homeowner, renter, landlord, or desire to take out a mortgage in DC, you do care.  

The Saving DC Homes from Foreclosure Emergency Amendment Act of 2010, stopped DC foreclosures when it became effective on November 17, 2010.  Unfortunately, almost no one had read or understood what this 41 page bill said or did.  The comment period for the rules created by the bill ended today and we are all about to find out what it means.  We do know that the new law requires that lenders send out a notice to borrowers they wish to foreclose upon letting them know they have the opportunity to mediate their dispute.  

The law requires the notice give disclosures that will rival the paperwork borrowers received when they purchased their home, so it seems unlikely anyone will read or understand much of it, but somewhere in there it gives them the opportunity to mediate.  Plus a self addressed stamped envelope they can return saying they want to mediate. They return this to the DC Government, who then schedules the mediation and tells the lender, a process that seems likley to be full of missed notices and scheduling errors, but I could be wrong.  In a perfect world then everyone sits down and mediates "in good faith."   Actually, the law requires that the lender mediate in good faith.  

The borrower then needs to get a cerificate showing that they mediated in good faith and failed to come to an agreement and they must sign an affidavit that says, among other things, that they would not be financially better off making an agreement.  Given that many of these are very new thirty year mortgages in default and unless you have a crystal ball telling you if the housing market or the job market or both will come back in the next couple of years I am not sure how anyone can say for sure they would be or would not be better off making an agreement, but that is the law.  


This is not everything the law requires, not even close.  If you are a lender or a borrower about to try to navigate the new DC foreclosure system, please don't try this at home.  Get help.  Lenders will not successfully get their property back without the assistance of counsel that knows every detail of this new law, because one mistake and you will be in DC Court for a very long time.  Borrowers may have an opportunity with this law but you are unlikely to be successful taking advantage of the provisions without counsel.  No one knows what any of this really means, except that it almost certainly means it will be harder and more expensive to get a mortgage in DC and all the foreclosures that have been bottled up in DC are about to come crashing down.  And any of us who works or lives in this system is in for a bumpy ride.